10 articles
Marcus Reeves on the science of intergenerational patterns — why the emotional scripts from your family of origin are still running in the background, and what it actually takes to rewrite them before you pass them on.
Marcus Reeves·
Marcus Reeves on why "bouncing back" after adversity is the wrong goal — and what the science of post-traumatic growth, habit change, and character strengths says about building forward instead of trying to return to who you were.
Marcus Reeves·
Marcus Reeves on identity grief — the loss nobody names, the shame spiral that follows, and the evidence-backed path through it. Because going around grief instead of through it doesn't work. It just relocates the problem.
Marcus Reeves·
Marcus Reeves on why pessimism isn't a personality trait — it's a learned explanatory style. The science of cognitive reappraisal, habit formation, and how to train your brain to explain setbacks differently.
Marcus Reeves·
Marcus Reeves on why aging doesn't have to mean slowing down — the research on exercise, resilience, and the mental models that separate people who thrive in their 40s, 50s, and beyond from those who just accept decline.
Marcus Reeves·
Marcus Reeves on why the best mentors are still doing the work — and how coaching someone else through adversity might be the fastest way to finally finish your own.
Marcus Reeves·
Marcus Reeves on why forgiveness isn't a spiritual practice — it's a performance decision. The science of psychological flexibility, rumination, and how to actually let go of what's been weighing you down.
Marcus Reeves·
Jordan Kessler reframes burnout as a systems design problem — and introduces the three-part patch that turns exhausted high-achievers into sustainably effective ones, backed by research.
Jordan Kessler·
Marcus Reeves on why emotional intelligence is the performance edge most competitors ignore — and the three practical EI skills that separate people who break through from those who burn out.
Marcus Reeves·
Marcus Reeves on why vague goals are emotionally satisfying but practically useless — and the three-question specificity test that actually moves the needle, backed by research.
Marcus Reeves·